9
May

Good Usability Sometimes is Bad!

   Posted by: wkossen   in Security

Mood: Interested

Installing XP on MacBook Pro - Using WMWareNow before y’all sceptics out there start getting into the disagreement mode, let’s see what actually is the reason for this rather controversial heading…

Good Usability means a application, apparatus, thing or whatyamightcallit (my spellingchecker had some problems with that one…) is sufficiently easy to use by those needing to use it and for the purpose they’re using it for. In general it’s a good thing for things to be usable. If we’re talking computer programs and websites this applies, too. But…

Could it actually be a problem if something complicated is easy to use? I think it is. Let’s look at operating systems for a minute. These do very complicated things, and – even worse – a lot can go wrong. If handling an operating system is easy, you might have serious problems when things go wrong. In general I would say that you should keep your hands of everything you don’t know enough about (define enough???). If you want to administer an operating system, you should be knowledgeable and experienced and know lots about the complexity you’re dealing with. If this complexity is hidden by a soothing layer of usability, things can go wrong very quickly and very badly. With all due respect to the guys at Microsoft, this is actually one of the reasons MS Windows is getting so much negative talk.

The question that remains is the whereabouts of the thin line between making difficult or dull tasks efficient or simple, and on the other hand making it too easy for unqualified people to mess things up… How unusable should a complicated thing be? How much RTFM are we allowed to demand from those dealing with complexities? In fact, isn’t a system that’s complicated and difficult to use more usable than a similarly complicated system that’s easy to mess up?

Of course, you could mess up the non-usable system, but that’s besides the point. If usability promotes error-free working, that isn’t so bad, but just think about this; Don’t strict and awkward security measures give you similar results?

I am interested to hear your opinions on this from you. Please don’t hesitate to comment or link.

Thanks for reading.

Related posts…


If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 9th, 2009 at 21:01 and is filed under Security. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Word count: 378

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One comment

 1 

But is the windows interface really that 'usable'? I think most users just click the way they think they're supposed to. I read some research a while ago, that most of the population is still unable to understand what it is the computer does, how they should visualize it, and how to use it. same goes for the internet? So keeping that in mind, is good usability (where you cater to all users) in reality unattainable ?

Security or locking actively prevents errors. while usability can be used to show the way how to use the application the way it's intended. It's all about balance.

May 12th, 2009 at 11:50

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2008 - 2010 Willem Kossen

you're welcome to reuse under certain conditions. It is licensed: Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Netherlands

Internet Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory


Page Rank

look here:

Blog Directory Blog Directory
Theme Tweaker by Unreal